Brian Morrissey, who I think has some really interesting insights about where advertising is going, writes that maybe there’s a case for interruption on the Web.

Here’s my comment to his post:

-
Brian,

I have Troy’s (from VideoEgg) PDF open on making the Web friendlier to brands from his post that you talk about above.

Do you really think this is about interruption? I don’t, and I don’t think Troy does either.

If we’re going to make the Web friendlier to brands, it also has to be friendlier to people. The move has to be one and the same.

Sure, this doesn’t mean people won’t put up with ads that mimic what they’re used to off the Web (like TV). For example, I love the big Apple ads on the NYTimes you refer to, but I simply put up with most of the prestitial ads on ESPN because I want the content.

Every time ESPN does that to me on the Web, it’s eroding its own brand as well as the advertiser’s, just a little every time.

Why not be as committed to me as the consumer as they are to the brand? It’s not even harder to do. Then, if they showed me “a big fun ad” as Troy talks about in his PDF, not only would I accept it, I’d welcome it.

In order to have “a media currency that measures discrete engagement,” which is Troy’s fourth idea to make the Web friendlier to brands, first you have to get people to engage.

Definitely, size and let’s call it “presence” (i.e., the banner does not disappear from the page as one scrolls down) are key to being noticed, but if engaging people is the goal – the very currency it all starts to be measured on (and therefore how the industry makes money) – then an ad’s size and presence has to be an integral part of making it happen, right?

In other words, the way the ad is presented can’t work against the goal of engagement or, really, the distributed, open structure of the Web.

ESPN is welcome to put an ad in front of me in a way that it’s hard for me to ignore, they should realize, though, that winning my full attention is the game. The NYTimes and Apple win this game every time, and the size/presence of the ad helps them do it.

-

Update: Speaking of ESPN ads that insert themselves between me and my content, T. Rowe Price thought that very thing would be a good idea (larger image, here).

There has to be a better way because just as I was about to enjoy a moment of Lakers battling Suns, T. Rowe Price is literally in my face, leaving me with the distinct feeling that this company doesn’t get me and likely has an old-school approach to investing. As for ESPN . . .

• «Previous Post
• Next Post »

---